3/30/2023 0 Comments Topaz sharpen ai presharpenThe program has groundbreaking tech, but you can tell it wasn't created by someone who has done volume photo finishing work, as working at volume is a complete non-thought. The closest you can get is "Zoom to Fit" and "Side by Side View" then let the preview regenerate (but this is largely flawed as the program has no concept of pre-generating/bulk generating the previews, so you cannot set it like you want then quickly grep through all your photos, it is this slow kludge while previews generate).Įven after purchase I just leave on auto, save all, then review the results via the JPG output to avoid the obnoxious "generating preview" every new image click (because doing preview gen for the next image in the background pre-emptively would make far too much sense). I get that they don't want people using it for free during the trial, but it made it much harder to evaluate. That bit of the Ai is perfect every time. The trial is worthless because the watermark always conceals the area of interest.Almost usable quality after (although the picture itself is bad/uninteresting). The main benefit of DeNoiseAI is that it supports Fuji whereas Photolab 4 cannot do X-Trans at all.Īuto mode picked Motion Blur, I hit "Very Blurry" and this is the result. PS - I think DeepPrime is better than Topaz' DeNoise AI but YMMV. That might somewhat explain why "Too Soft" rarely improves pictures (but honestly it feels like a fallback mode, rather than say they detected no fixable abnormalities). I use Sharpen AI as the absolute last thing in my workflow on the JPEG output (in particular after de-noise but also after regular sharpen/lens corrections). While Deep Prime is better de-noise than Adobe Raw, neither one really does exactly what the Motion Blur/Out of Focus does in Sharpen AI. My photos are either processed in Adobe Raw or more recently Photolab 4 (w/Deep Prime). Normally I just leave it on full Auto and very rarely have a photo "downgraded." Specifically "Motion Blur" sometimes does miraculous things and "Out of Focus" occasionally improves pictures, whereas "Too Soft" seemingly does nothing. If it helps, I paid retail (w/random coupon), and have found good results in 2/3 of the modes it offers. You're right not to trust the reviewers, particularly if they fail to declare the conflict.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |